kambourav

The European Parliament recently passed a resolution (‘the Resolution’) “urg[ing] the European Commission to initiate immediately the process towards a coordinated exit of the EU from the Energy Charter Treaty and call[ing] on the Council to support such a proposal. This happened against the backdrop of numerous withdrawals from the Energy Charter Treaty (‘ECT’/’the Treaty’) announced by Member States in November. The resolution was passed only two days after the majority of ECT contracting parties did not support the proposed modernised version of the ECT which was aiming to ensure that the Treaty is compatible with the Paris Agreement on climate change (see also The Energy Charter Treaty in Light of the Climate Change Agenda).

Although not binding for the European Commission, the Resolution signals EU’s intention towards the ECT. Such a coordinated exit from the Treaty, however, has some short- and long-term implications as the ECT contains a sunset clause (Article 47) which would leave Member States liable under the Treaty for 20 years after the withdrawal takes effect. This means that there is a high risk for Member States to face investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) arbitration, especially arbitration related to climate-change related issues, for a 20-year period after the withdrawal.

The Resolution stressed the importance of the sunset clause, confirming that the European Commission had prepared a draft inter se agreement. Its aim is to clarify that the ECT and its sunset clause do not, and never did, apply in an intra-EU context. In practice, such an agreement would mean that investor protection under the ECT would cease following the withdrawal on the territories of willing contracting parties which sign up for it. It is unclear, however, how the neutralization of the sunset clause which is theoretically possible would materialize and in what ways it would be interpreted by arbitral tribunals.

As the European Parliament’s Resolution is recent, developments on the matter have still not unfolded. The remaining question is whether and/or when the European Commission will start the withdrawal process. Even if this happens, the Council of the EU will need to formally approve it.

See our latest News

Minh Nguyễn Hoàng

Division of Inherited Property in Viet Nam: When Co-heirs...

October 17, 2025

Minh Nguyễn Hoàng

The Validity of Testaments Made at Law Firms

October 15, 2025

Charles Savva

Why Investor-Immigration Advisors Are Betraying Clients —...

October 15, 2025

Saika Alam

The role of Third-Party Intervenors in Matrimonial Financ...

October 15, 2025

Saika Alam

What are my alternatives to court in order to resolve my ...

October 15, 2025

Mark Benton

Litigation in Korea – Bringing a Civil Claim – Article 3

October 14, 2025

Alicea Castellanos

EUA ENCERRAM EM GRANDE PARTE O USO DE CHEQUES EM PAPEL

October 10, 2025

Alicea Castellanos

EE. UU. DEJA EN GRAN PARTE EL USO DE CHEQUES EN PAPEL

October 9, 2025

Alicea Castellanos

U.S. LARGELY CEASES USE OF PAPER CHECKS

October 8, 2025

Shana Schreier-Joffe

Workplace Investigations: A Step-by-Step Guide for Employers

October 7, 2025