A firm desires to win many clients in order to have a prosperous business while a client intends to engage a firm capable of providing competent services at a competitive fees if possible/applicable. This world is full of wonders such that a client only meets its predestined firm possibly rather than the most competent firm. On the other hand, a firm, regardless of how competent it is, may not be lucky enough to serve clients it deserves to provide competent services therewith. Although this is a kind of dilemma for either a client or a firm, it is nevertheless the life. In traditional Chinese age, a person intending to prove he is the top master in respect of the martial arts in the world will announce a battle post declaring that any other person in the world who believes self-owning better martial arts than the announcer is welcome to get the martial arts world champion on a martial arts competition platform in a specific date at a specific place. Enlightened by such history and with the advent of the Internet, as the claims of a patent are the core or essential of the patent rights, it becomes relatively easier to find out, if desired, the competence of Deep & Far from the client by, e.g. 1) sending this firm a pending or granted patent for our comments about how we can improve the claims, 2) sending us a pending patent specification without the claims for us to draft the claims for the client’s comparison with the original claims, or 3) sending to the firm the client is currently using and this firm at the same time an initial disclosure so that the client can compare and find out which firm can provide the better claims.